<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Newer is not always better</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.quis.com/2007/02/05/newer-is-not-always-better/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.quis.com/2007/02/05/newer-is-not-always-better</link>
	<description>Dan Katz&#039;s thoughts on marketing, customer service, woodworking, his baby boy and other musings.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 30 Aug 2010 19:45:01 -0400</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Peter</title>
		<link>http://www.quis.com/2007/02/05/newer-is-not-always-better/comment-page-1#comment-2</link>
		<dc:creator>Peter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Feb 2007 21:24:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.quis.com/wordpress/?p=6#comment-2</guid>
		<description>This may be blasphemous for a Bostonian to say but I recently switched to the Schick Quattro. Here is my blog post on it:

&lt;a href=&quot;http://peterskim.wordpress.com/2006/10/15/schick-quattro-vs-gillette-mach-3/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Schick Quattro vs. Gillette Mach 3&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This may be blasphemous for a Bostonian to say but I recently switched to the Schick Quattro. Here is my blog post on it:</p>
<p><a href="http://peterskim.wordpress.com/2006/10/15/schick-quattro-vs-gillette-mach-3/" rel="nofollow">Schick Quattro vs. Gillette Mach 3</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
<!-- WP Super Cache is installed but broken. The path to wp-cache-phase1.php in wp-content/advanced-cache.php must be fixed! -->